Close
Close Browser Alert
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
  • Perspectives
  • Case Studies
    Toggle Section
    • Case Studies Search
  • Expertise
    Toggle Section
    • Advisory
      Toggle Section
      • Asset Management
      • Business Case Development
      • Finance and Economic Analysis
      • Logistics and Infrastructure Policy
      • Regulation and Access
      • Risk Management
      • Transaction Advisory
    • Architecture and Design
    • Buildings
      Toggle Section
      • Asset and Facilities Management
      • Automation
      • Demolition and Decommissioning
      • Digital Design
      • Geotechnical
      • Land Development and Urban Planning
      • Materials, Process and Plant Engineering
        Toggle Section
        • Materials Handling
        • Minerals Processing
        • Plant Engineering
      • Mechanical, Electrical, Fire and Life Safety
        Toggle Section
        • Electrical Engineering - Building
        • Fire and Life Safety
        • HVAC
        • Hydraulics - Building
      • Project Management
        Toggle Section
        • Project and Construction Management
      • Security, Information, Communication and Technology
        Toggle Section
        • Communication Systems
        • Security
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Structures
    • Digital
      Toggle Section
      • Digital Experience
      • D-Lab
      • Digital Intelligence
    • Energy and Resources
      Toggle Section
      • Asset and Facilities Management
      • Automation
      • Chemicals
      • Dams
      • Engagement, Communication and Communities
      • Emergency Response
      • Geology
      • Geotechnical
      • HSE Systems and Industrial Hygiene
      • Impact Assessment and Permitting
      • Integrated Water Management
      • Materials, Process and Plant Engineering
        Toggle Section
        • Materials Handling
        • Minerals Processing
        • Plant Engineering
      • Materials Technology
      • Mechanical, Electrical, Fire and Life Safety
        Toggle Section
        • Electrical Engineering - Building
        • Fire and Life Safety
        • Hydraulics - Building
      • Mining Engineering and Geosciences
      • Oil and Gas
      • Power
      • Project and Construction Management
      • Risk Management
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Tailings (Mines and Residue)
      • Wastewater Treatment and Recycling
      • Tunnels
      • EPCM
    • Environment
      Toggle Section
      • Air and Noise
        Toggle Section
        • Computational Fluid Dynamics
      • Aquatic Sciences
      • Contamination Assessment and Remediation
      • Demolition and Decommissioning
      • Engagement, Communication and Communities
      • Food and Agriculture
        Toggle Section
        • Agriculture
        • Food Processing
        • Forestry Management
      • HSE Systems and Industrial Hygiene
      • Hydrogeology
      • Hydrology and Hydrodynamics
        Toggle Section
        • Climate Change
        • Waterways and Coastal
      • Impact Assessment and Permitting
      • International Development Assistance (IDA)
      • Maritime and Coastal Engineering
      • Natural Resources
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Sustainability
      • Waste Management
    • Future Communities
    • Future Energy
    • Future of Water
    • Geosciences
      Toggle Section
      • Contamination Assessment & Remediation
      • Dams
      • Geology
      • Geotechnical
      • Hydrogeology
      • Mining Engineering and Geoscience
      • Risk Management
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Tailings (Mines and Residue)
      • Tunnels
    • Project Management
      Toggle Section
      • Construction Contracting
      • Engagement, Communication and Communities
      • EPCM
      • International Development Assistance (IDA)
      • Project and Construction Management
    • Transportation
      Toggle Section
      • Air and Noise
      • Architecture, Interior Design, Landscape Architecture and Urban Design
      • Asset and Facilities Management
      • Aviation
      • Bridges
      • Digital Design
      • Engagement, Communication and Communities
      • Geotechnical
      • Impact Assessment and Permitting
      • Maritime and Coastal Engineering
      • Materials Technology
      • Railways
      • Road Systems
        Toggle Section
        • Pavement Engineering
        • Road Network Management
      • Structures
      • Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
      • Tunnels
      • Intelligent Transport Systems
      • Sustainability and Human Rights
    • Water
      Toggle Section
      • Automation
      • Circular Economy
      • Dams
      • Engagement, Communication and Communities
      • Food and Agriculture
        Toggle Section
        • Agriculture
        • Food Processing
        • Forestry Management
      • Hydrogeology
      • Hydrology and Hydrodynamics
        Toggle Section
        • Climate Change
        • Waterways and Coastal
      • Impact Assessment and Permitting
      • Integrated Water Management
      • Maritime and Coastal Engineering
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Wastewater and Stormwater Collection Systems
      • Wastewater Treatment and Recycling
      • Water Treatment and Desalination
        Toggle Section
        • Desalination
        • Water Treatment
      • Water Collection and Distribution
  • Careers
    Toggle Section
    • Opportunities
      Toggle Section
      • Graduates and students
    • Life@GHD
    • Work@GHD
  • Contact
    Toggle Section
    • Feedback Form
  • About Us
    Toggle Section
    • Annual Review
    • Community
    • Inclusion & Diversity
    • Health, Safety and Environment
    • History
      Toggle Section
      • A Firm Foundation
      • Breaking New Ground
    • Integrity Management
    • News and Insights
      Toggle Section
      • Transforming perspectives on complex sites
        Toggle Section
        • Water
        • Energy & Resources
          Toggle Section
          • GHD Advisory Delivers Landmark Rehabilitation Plan for Port Terminal
        • Benzene Fenceline Monitoring Program
        • Property & Buildings
        • Transportation
        • Digital
          Toggle Section
          • The difficulties of “yes”
        • Advisory
        • Project Management
        • Planning for uncertainty
        • Non-revenue water losses
        • Achieving business sustainability
        • Flood Modelling and Water meter Calibration
        • Waste to Energy for Wastewater Treatment
        • Integrated Water Management
        • Resource Recovery from Wastewater
        • Transitioning to customer-centric apporaches
        • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
        • California children affected by lead poisoning
        • Water Recycling Fund Program
        • Upgrading Kangaroo Creek Dam
        • Complying with industrial stormwater planning updates
        • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
        • Filtering microplastics
        • Lead in Drinking Water
        • Permitting for industrial stormwater discharge in Illinois
        • Storm Water Grant Program (SWGP)
        • Water Recycling Fund Program
        • Microgrid in WA
        • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
        • Permitting for industrial stormwater discharge in Illinois
        • Court upholds emission monitoring for oil and gas
        • Storm Water Grant Program (SWGP)
        • Enabling electricity evolution
        • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
        • Infrastructure owners face change
        • Proposed emission reductions for oil and gas
        • Underground storage closure requirements
        • US Congress votes to lift US oil export ban
        • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
        • Managing Outrage
        • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
        • Lead in Drinking Water
        • Proposed emission reductions for oil and gas
        • USEPA intends to expand the Risk Management Program
        • Transforming perspectives on complex sites
        • Complying with chemical data reporting
        • Risk Assessment and Toxicology Update On TSCA Reform
        • Court upholds emission monitoring for oil and gas
        • California Organics Diversion Regulatory Update
        • California children affected by lead poisoning
        • Change Notification to ISO 14001:2015
        • Task force recommendations for expedited site cleanup
        • Proposed Revisions to Site Remediation MACT
        • New Ontario online registry for environmental permits
        • Federal guidance released for human health risk assessments
        • Revised UST regulations
        • Lead levels updated for remediation
        • Remediation guidance for adaptive site management
        • USEPA intends to expand the Risk Management Program
        • New toxicity values for EPA screening calculator
        • TSCA Reform is on its way to become a law
        • New Strategy for Waste-Free Ontario
        • Final ruling issued on exposure to Crystalline Silica
        • Fill and Excess Soil Regulatory Update
        • Future of Western Sydney
        • USEPA Vapor Intrusion Technical Guide
        • Hazard awareness training for demolition services
        • Big Data
        • Digital Technologies
        • Digital Disruption
        • Canada hosts international forum on public private partnerships
        • Public private partnership forum examines lessons for transit
        • New Strategy for Waste-Free Ontario
        • Hazard awareness training for demolition services
        • Complying with chemical data reporting
        • Fill and Excess Soil Regulatory Update
        • Project Management for Large Transport Projects
        • Public private partnership forum examines lessons for transit
        • Canada hosts international forum on public private partnerships
        • Transforming perspectives on complex sites
        • Risk Assessment and Toxicology Update On TSCA Reform
        • Critical insights from P3 2017 in Toronto, Canada
        • Pioneering New Energy Systems
          Toggle Section
          • Protecting Critical Energy Infrastructure
        • Solving the PFAS puzzle
        • How major rail is keeping pace
        • Environmental data and public communications for fast-tracked infrastructure projects
      • News
        Toggle Section
        • GHD appoints Andre Ribeiro as Chief Marketing Officer
      • Publications
      • Insights
        Toggle Section
        • Committed to communities
    • Our leadership
      Toggle Section
      • Our Board
      • Enterprise Leadership Team
    • Proud to be employee owned
    • Sustainability
    • Values and Culture
    • Client Service Awards
    • Vendors
Skip to Content
iCreate Base Site Logo
  • Perspectives
  • Case Studies
    • Case Studies Search
  • Expertise
    • Advisory
    • Architecture and Design
    • Buildings
    • Digital
    • Energy and Resources
    • Environment
    • Future Communities
    • Future Energy
    • Future of Water
    • Geosciences
    • Project Management
    • Transportation
    • Water
  • Careers
    • Opportunities
    • Life@GHD
    • Work@GHD
  • Contact
    • Feedback Form
  • About Us
    • Annual Review
    • Community
    • Inclusion & Diversity
    • Health, Safety and Environment
    • History
    • Integrity Management
    • News and Insights
    • Our leadership
    • Proud to be employee owned
    • Sustainability
    • Values and Culture
    • Client Service Awards
    • Vendors
Search
Global
Change Your Location
  • Global
  • Australia
  • Canada (English)
  • Canada (français)
  • Chile
  • China
  • Fiji / South Pacific
  • New Zealand
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Philippines
  • Qatar
  • Singapore
  • UAE
  • UK
  • United States
  • Awards and Rankings
  • Policy Statements
  • Quality Management Systems

Container Ship

How can we prevent global supply disruptions like the Suez Canal blockage?

HomePerspectives

The blockage of the Suez Canal by the Ever Given has demonstrated that global supply chains are vulnerable to a single point of failure – albeit this is the first time the canal has been closed since the 1967-1975 conflict between Egypt and Israel.

The recent closure occurred at a time when global supply chains have already been stretched by the coronavirus outbreak, giving rise to consumer and industrial demands and a worldwide shortage of containers. Higher freight volumes and lower contingencies mean that these global supply bottlenecks now have a greater impact.

Although ‘just in time’ supply chains may be a thing of the past, as the industry evolves to a ‘just in case’ model to create a more reliable network and minimise risk, the need to mitigate supply chain disruption is more necessary now than ever. We need to understand what caused the blockage and assess whether it requires a process or infrastructure solution (i.e. do we prevent vessels in the canal if similar weather conditions occur, or is it a modification to the canal)? In the long run this will help eliminate the knock-on effects of disruptions. However, we cannot look past the need to address this issue systemically.

To address the knock-on effect to the entire supply chain (as opposed to individual shippers/companies), robust response scenarios need to be developed for different types of disruptive events.

‘What-if’ scenarios and contingency planning can be extremely valuable and should be considered in all layers of supply chain planning.

Scenario planning should not be a ‘one-off' exercise but instead conducted at a system-wide level with industry representative bodies and governments who have a responsibility to make sure such risks are being looked at holistically and systemically. There is also an onus on beneficial cargo owners of the world and all the other parties in the supply chain to challenge one another in considering where the vulnerabilities are and what the options are to offset such risks.

In the context of the global supply chain, logistics providers and transport asset owners need to be prepared to explore alternative routing options for example considering what air cargo options can exist in lieu of traditional ocean. The development of more container rail options from East Asia to Europe is good example of alternative routing. The foundation beneath all of this is to diversify sourcing options to enable quick pivots.

How dynamic simulation can enable better response actions

As the global supply chain backlog from the Suez Canal clears (which is expected to take between one to two months), we have an opportunity now to minimise the risk of such disruption occurring again. Prolonged disruption of the movement of goods can be extremely harmful for economies and communities that depend on reliable connections. Scenario planning and dynamic simulations enable us to better understand the complexity of freight networks that span the globe and identify failures.

Ship Container

Increasingly dynamic models, sometimes referred to as techno-economic models and digital twins are used to understand, optimise and plan the development of our critical infrastructure. Such models use different linear and non-linear logic to accurately simulate how infrastructure ‘ecosystems’ perform given different assumptions, business rules and external inputs. These models can simulate the impact of disruptive events and test multiple response scenario options.

In the case of the Suez Canal, historical vessel movement data could be used to develop a simulation model which considers global shipping flows. This type of model could then be used to see how vessels would build up in the event of such an incident and understand the effects of different scenarios, in order to facilitate decision-making and minimise the effect on global supply chains. For example, simulating the impact of an immediate decision to re-route all vessels around Africa. The added benefit here is the ability to assess the overall economic cost of delayed production inputs, exports, trade, fuel supply depletion which ultimately impact GDP. Importantly these models can understand and quantify systemic risks across supply chains and enable us to test where, when and how we intervene to enable the lowest net-risk outcome.

The peak season for container trade is soon upon us with rising consumer demand and therefore the need for transportation options will only grow. Fundamentally speaking, all parties in the global supply chain must continue to embrace the investment of using data to make more informed decisions. That same data can be shared holistically, enabling the greater supply chain to build modeling options, ultimately yielding nimbleness and resilience.


About Tristan:

Tristan is an accomplished ports, logistics, infrastructure, property and finance professional. With experience in developing and operating complex infrastructure and supply chains and fundamentally, Tristan believes incremental value can be created from even very established infrastructure and businesses through being analytical, identifying and evaluating opportunities and working collaboratively.

Tristan Anderson

Tristan Anderson
Market Sector Leader - Transport
Australia
Tristan.Anderson@ghd.com

Explore our Logistics and Infrastructure Policy services here.


Stay connected to our expert insights

Subscribe


Logistic Modelling

Unlocking new markets through transport logistics modelling - GHD

Freight Ship

Keep Freight Moving

Port

Logistics and Infrastructure Policy - GHD

Follow Us: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn YouTube
News and InsightsLegal NoticesModern Day Slavery StatementPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use

Copyright © GHD 2020

Sitemap
Increase Contrast
Top